This is so good Increasingly the output of an agency looks like a folder of files for agents, instead of one-off assets "Get paid for your mind, not your hands"
这太棒了。agency 的产出越来越像是一个给 agent 使用的文件夹，而不是一次性的成品资产。“Get paid for your mind, not your hands”
People should build agents/skills for their cross-functional teams. For example, if a design team builds a design agent/skill for the marketing team (trained on all of the brand's guidelines and design patterns), then the marketing team can produce more on-brand assets without having to bug designers every time But the marketing team couldn't have built this on their own; it takes the designer with their expertise, context, and knowledge Same thing applies to every pair of teams that work closely with each other, often rely on each other, and complain about each other's limited bandwidth Building agents for your cross-functional teams ensures each team can be more self-sufficient, and moves us to a direction where teams can be organized by "loops" rather than "functions"
人们应该为自己的 cross-functional teams（跨职能团队）构建 agent/skills。如果一个 design team 为 marketing team 构建了一个 design agent/skill（基于品牌的全部 guidelines 和 design patterns 进行训练），那么 marketing team 就能产出更多符合品牌调性的资产，而不必每次都去麻烦设计师。但 marketing team 不可能靠自己做出这个东西；这需要设计师及其专业能力、上下文和知识。这个逻辑同样适用于任何一对紧密协作、经常相互依赖、又总抱怨彼此带宽有限的团队。为你的 cross-functional teams 构建 agent，能确保每个团队都更具自给自足能力，也会推动我们走向一种按“loops”而不是按“functions”来组织团队的方向。
It seems like most startups in San Francisco are selling products to each other When I ask founders who their target audience is, 90% of the time it's "engineering and product teams, AI-native startups" Feels like the same small group of target audience is being bombarded with a million products, whereas very few people are building for the 99% of the world
看起来，San Francisco 的大多数 startup 都在互相卖产品。当我问创始人他们的目标受众是谁时，90% 的情况下答案都是“engineering 和 product teams，AI-native startups”。感觉同样这一小撮目标用户，正在被海量产品轮番轰炸，而与此同时，真正为这个世界 99% 的人构建产品的人却很少。