BuildSpeak每日 builder 文摘
今日归档生词本关于
🐦 X · 动态Peter Yang @petergyang· 2026 年 7 月 10 日· 524 词 · 约 3 分钟

Peter Yang · @petergyang

SPACE 播放 / 暂停·←→ 上一句 / 下一句
Watching this made me remember how insanely great the 2022 World Cup final was. One of the best of all time. Maybe a rematch this year?
看这个让我想起 2022 World Cup 决赛有多么精彩到离谱。绝对是史上最经典的一场之一。也许今年会再来一次 rematch(重赛)?
♥ 47↻ 0💬 4x.com ↗
Some praise and feedback about OpenAI's launches: 1. More than any other lab, OpenAI has the opportunity to make working with agents mainstream. ChatGPT with images, live voice, browser/computer use, and plugins for all your favorite apps is the closest thing to working with a super-capable coworker who can learn and do any white collar work. 2. I didn't get to test GPT 5.6 weeks early, but after a day of testing, I think my best compliment is: "It's got that dog in it." It basically never gives up, no matter how complicated a task you give it, and is very reliable thanks to browser use and the other features above. It does seem to burn more tokens than GPT 5.5, although maybe I don't have the right settings. I'm using Sol on High. 3. GPT Live is arguably a more important launch than today's updates for the masses. We've been talking to each other using voice for 100K+ years, while the keyboard and mouse weren't introduced until the 1950s/60s. Maybe voice will soon make these two tools look like old computer punch cards. Also, the best thing about GPT Live is that it lets me pick the intelligence level. I care about latency, but I care more about talking to someone who's smart and gets me. Speaking of which, it'd be cool if I could have a live conversation with ChatGPT voice and see the tasks it's doing for me. Ok, now for some constructive feedback: 4. I think the ChatGPT Work vs. Codex thing is confusing. It raises questions like, "So developers aren't working?" and "What if I'm using it to plan my vacation, is that work?" I think the whole thing should just be called ChatGPT, Codex, or ChatGPT Codex and there should be no tabs or toggles. IMO, Codex is not that complicated for a normie to understand and use. You're still chatting, except now it can do stuff. The sooner this is all unified, the better. 5. I'm very confused about when I should use Sol, Terra, or Luna, and whether I should set effort to Light, Medium, High, etc. There's nothing in the UI that walks through what to use when. I understand power users might want these options, but regular people will just get confused. 6. Another thing that's confusing is tasks vs. chat. Ideally, your past chats should still be there in the left nav, except now those chats can do something with plugins. Normies will not understand why their chat history is suddenly harder to find. 7. When I was a PM, I loved building with a community of trusted users who gave me feedback along the way before general availability. But I also tried to make it transparent to users what qualifications were needed to join this community. I don't mind that OpenAI is doing the former, but the latter is not clear at all. Thanks for listening. Codex has changed how I work and for that I'm very grateful.
关于 OpenAI 这些发布,我有一些赞赏和反馈:1. 相比其他任何 lab,OpenAI 都更有机会把与 agent(智能代理)协作这件事带入主流。带有 images、live voice、browser/computer use,以及适用于你所有常用 app 的 plugins 的 ChatGPT,已经是最接近“与一位能力超强、能学习并完成任何白领工作任务的同事一起工作”的东西了。2. 我没能提前 6 周测试 GPT 5.6,但在测试了一天之后,我觉得我能给出的最高评价是:“It's got that dog in it.” 基本上,不管你交给它的任务有多复杂,它几乎从不放弃;再加上 browser use 和上面那些其他功能,它也非常可靠。看起来它确实比 GPT 5.5 消耗更多 tokens,不过也可能是我没调对设置。我现在用的是 Sol 的 High。3. 对大众来说,GPT Live 也许比今天这些更新更重要。我们用 voice 彼此交谈已经有 100K+ 年了,而 keyboard 和 mouse 直到 1950s/60s 才出现。也许很快,voice 会让这两种工具看起来像老式计算机 punch cards 一样过时。另外,GPT Live 最棒的一点,是它让我可以选择 intelligence level。我在乎 latency,但我更在乎对话对象够聪明、能理解我。说到这个,如果我能一边和 ChatGPT voice 实时对话,一边看到它在替我执行哪些任务,那就很酷了。好了,接下来是一些建设性的反馈:4. 我觉得 ChatGPT Work 和 Codex 这个区分很让人困惑。它会引出一些问题,比如“所以开发者不算在工作吗?”以及“如果我用它来规划假期,这算 work 吗?”我觉得整个东西就应该统一叫 ChatGPT、Codex,或者 ChatGPT Codex,而且不该有 tabs 或 toggles。IMO,Codex 并没有复杂到普通人理解不了、用不了。你本质上还是在聊天,只不过现在它还能做事。越早把这些统一起来越好。5. 我非常困惑到底什么时候该用 Sol、Terra 或 Luna,以及 effort 应该设成 Light、Medium、High 等等。UI 里完全没有告诉用户在什么情况下该用什么。我理解重度用户可能想要这些选项,但普通人只会被搞糊涂。6. 另一个让人困惑的点是 tasks 和 chat 的区别。理想情况下,你过去的 chats 应该仍然保留在左侧导航里,只不过现在这些 chats 还能通过 plugins 做一些事。普通用户不会明白,为什么自己的 chat history 突然变得更难找了。7. 我以前做 PM 的时候,很喜欢和一群值得信赖的用户一起共建产品,在正式 general availability 之前一路给我反馈。但我也会尽量让用户清楚,要加入这个社群需要满足什么资格条件。我不介意 OpenAI 在做前者,但后者现在一点也不清楚。感谢你听我说这些。Codex 改变了我的工作方式,对此我非常感激。
♥ 104↻ 2💬 18x.com ↗
Ugh France is way too stacked
唉,France 的阵容也太豪华了
♥ 10↻ 1💬 2x.com ↗
原文 ↗https://x.com/petergyang
BuildSpeak — 关于本项目BUILT IN PUBLIC · 跟随 builders 而非 influencers