So let me get this straight: 1. We publish frontier models 2. They get distilled into cheap open source models 3. US companies adopt the same open source models because they're good enough and much cheaper 4. We start gating access to frontier models What next? US companies innovate less? Open source models become more attractive?
所以让我确认一下我理解得对不对：1. 我们发布 frontier models（前沿模型）2. 它们被蒸馏成廉价的开源模型 3. 美国公司因为这些开源模型“够好”而且便宜得多，于是采用了同样的开源模型 4. 我们开始限制对 frontier models（前沿模型）的访问。接下来会怎样？美国公司创新变少？开源模型变得更有吸引力？
From what I'm seeing, alot of the money has moved to services (with some software bundled), not software. People want outcomes, not tools. It's feels really hard to build a pure-play software company that's more valuable to people or companies than just using Codex/Claude Code with a bunch of personal skills and agents. Thoughts?
从我目前看到的情况来看，很多钱已经流向了服务（附带一些软件），而不是软件本身。人们想要的是结果，不是工具。现在感觉要打造一家纯软件公司非常难，而且它对个人或公司的价值，很难超过“直接用 Codex/Claude Code，再加上一堆个人技能和 agents（智能体）”这种组合。你怎么看？
Small things I wish Claude Code had: 1. Bring back ability to steer conversations while Claude is working 2. Make mobile remote control for all threads on by default 3. The shortcut keys seem only accessible if you have the sub-menu open? Consider supporting "cmd + key" so we can hotkey to different threads with the keyboard. If I hold down cmd I should see all the shortcuts in the UI. 4. Let me drag and drop to re-arrange my projects on left nav
我希望 Claude Code 能有的一些小改进：1. 把 Claude 工作时仍然可以引导对话的能力加回来 2. 默认开启移动端对所有线程的远程控制 3. 快捷键似乎只有在你打开子菜单时才能看到？可以考虑支持 “cmd + key”，这样我们就能用键盘热键切换到不同线程。如果我按住 cmd，我应该能在 UI 里看到所有快捷键。4. 允许我通过拖拽重新排列左侧导航里的项目