BuildSpeak每日 builder 文摘
今日归档生词本关于
🐦 X · 动态Dan Shipper @danshipper· 2026 年 5 月 16 日· 152 词 · 约 1 分钟

Dan Shipper · @danshipper

SPACE 播放 / 暂停·←→ 上一句 / 下一句
Codex-native apps are the future.
原生面向 Codex 的 app 将是未来。
♥ 284↻ 12💬 9x.com ↗
This is the future
这就是未来。
♥ 67↻ 0💬 9x.com ↗
our full deep-dive on trying to launch an agent-as-a-service platform built on openclaw! my two bigs ones: 1. OpenClaw is awesome but it's EXTREMELY hard to build on it as a platform. it moves super fast, there are tons of regressions, it's not great to be the layer in between OpenClaw and a user 2. One super agent for a company beats 1-1 agents for everyone. I do think we're going to get there over time, but for now agents actually require a lot of work (often technical) to keep working well. And people with jobs don't want to be messing with the internals of the agent all day. However if you give everyone an agent that works really well and make it someone's job to make it good for the whole company...lots of good stuff ensues stay tuned we'll have more on this @every!
这是我们对尝试推出一个基于 openclaw 构建的 agent-as-a-service 平台所做的完整深度复盘!我有两个最大的结论:1. OpenClaw 很棒,但把它作为一个平台来构建东西极其困难。它变化非常快,回归问题(regressions)很多,而且夹在 OpenClaw 和用户之间做中间层并不是一件很理想的事。2. 对一家公司来说,一个超级 agent 胜过给每个人都配一个 1 对 1 agent。我的确认为,随着时间推移我们会走到那一步,但就目前而言,agent 实际上仍然需要大量工作(而且往往是技术性的)才能持续保持良好运行。而有正式工作的人,并不想整天都去折腾 agent 的内部机制。不过,如果你给每个人一个运行得非常好的 agent,并且把“让它对整个公司都足够好”变成某个人的职责……那就会产生很多好的结果。敬请关注,我们之后还会在 @every 发布更多相关内容!
♥ 131↻ 5💬 26x.com ↗
原文 ↗https://x.com/danshipper
BuildSpeak — 关于本项目BUILT IN PUBLIC · 跟随 builders 而非 influencers