The teams seeing the biggest wins from AI are completely changing how they work, not speeding up what they already do. What steps can you delete, what handoffs go away, what can an agent just own end to end. Great to see Salesforce go this deep. Shoutout to Srini, @Benioff & team. Full writeup:
那些从 AI 中获得最大收益的团队，正在彻底改变他们的工作方式，而不是仅仅给自己原本在做的事提速。哪些步骤可以删除，哪些交接可以消失，哪些事情可以直接由一个 agent（智能体）端到端负责。很高兴看到 Salesforce 做到这么深入。向 Srini、@Benioff 和团队致敬。完整文章：
Quality went up alongside output. Even with more PRs shipping, total incidents dropped 5%. They built security guardrails and quality standards into the agentic workflow itself. Productivity vs quality is sometimes framed as a tradeoff. They're not seeing it.
质量随着产出一同提升。即使有更多 PRs 交付上线，总 incident（事故/故障）数量还是下降了 5%。他们把安全 guardrails（护栏机制）和质量标准直接内建进了 agentic workflow（智能体工作流）本身。生产力与质量有时会被表述成一种权衡关系。但他们并没有看到这种情况。
Salesforce published a detailed writeup on going agentic with Claude Code. A couple things jumped out. A migration they'd scoped at 231 days shipped in 13. One PR delivered 21 endpoints at 100% test coverage.
Salesforce 发布了一篇关于如何用 Claude Code 推行 agentic 的详细文章。有几件事特别醒目。一个原本估算需要 231 天的迁移项目，13 天就交付了。还有一个 PR 一次性交付了 21 个 endpoint（接口），测试覆盖率达到 100%。